Banking Model vs Problem-Posing Model in Education - Understanding the Key Differences

Last Updated Jun 21, 2025
Banking Model vs Problem-Posing Model in Education - Understanding the Key Differences

The Banking Model of education treats learners as passive recipients of fixed knowledge deposited by instructors, limiting critical thinking and creativity. In contrast, the Problem-Posing Model encourages active dialogue, critical reflection, and collaborative knowledge construction, empowering students to question and transform their understanding. Explore deeper insights into how these educational paradigms impact learning effectiveness and student engagement.

Main Difference

The Banking Model of education treats students as passive recipients of knowledge, where information is deposited by the teacher and memorized by the learner. In contrast, the Problem-Posing Model encourages active dialogue and critical thinking, positioning students as co-creators of knowledge through collaborative inquiry. This model fosters transformative learning by engaging students in questioning and reflection rather than rote memorization. Paulo Freire introduced the Problem-Posing Model as a method to empower learners and promote social change.

Connection

The Banking Model and Problem-Posing Model represent contrasting educational paradigms where the former views students as passive recipients of knowledge, while the latter encourages active critical thinking and dialogue. Paulo Freire introduced the Problem-Posing Model to challenge the authoritarian nature of the Banking Model by fostering student-teacher interaction and reflection. This connection highlights the shift from rote memorization to an empowerment-based learning process that promotes awareness and transformative action.

Comparison Table

Aspect Banking Model Problem-Posing Model
Definition Education approach where students are considered empty accounts to be filled by the teacher. Education approach encouraging dialogue and critical thinking where students and teachers co-create knowledge.
Theorist Paulo Freire Paulo Freire
Role of Teacher Depositor of knowledge, authority figure who transmits information. Facilitator and co-learner who encourages questioning and discussion.
Role of Student Passive recipient of information, memorizer. Active participant who questions and reflects critically.
Teaching Method One-way communication focused on rote memorization. Dialogical and interactive, fostering critical thinking.
Goal Transmission of fixed knowledge and maintaining status quo. Empowerment through critical consciousness and transformation of reality.
Cognitive Engagement Low - focused on memorization. High - involves analysis, synthesis, and evaluation.
Criticism Promotes passive learning and limits creativity. Can be time-consuming and challenging for traditional educational systems.

Passive Learning

Passive learning, a traditional educational approach, involves students receiving information without actively engaging in the learning process. Common in lecture-based settings, it emphasizes listening and memorization over critical thinking and interaction. Studies show passive learning often leads to lower retention rates compared to active learning techniques. Educators increasingly integrate multimedia tools and interactive activities to transform passive content into dynamic learning experiences.

Active Engagement

Active engagement in education significantly improves student learning outcomes by fostering participation and critical thinking. Methods such as collaborative projects, interactive discussions, and problem-based learning encourage deeper understanding and retention of material. Research from the National Education Association reveals that students involved in active learning environments demonstrate higher academic achievement and motivation. Incorporating technology tools like educational apps and virtual simulations further enhances engagement and personalized learning experiences.

Teacher-Centered

Teacher-centered education emphasizes the instructor's role as the primary source of knowledge, often utilizing lectures and direct instruction. This approach prioritizes structured curricula and standardized assessments to ensure consistent learning outcomes across diverse student populations. Research from the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) shows that teacher-led methods can improve foundational skills in early education but may limit critical thinking development. Modern pedagogical trends advocate for blending teacher-centered strategies with student-centered learning to balance content mastery and engagement.

Student Agency

Student agency in education empowers learners to take active control over their learning processes, fostering critical thinking and self-regulation. This approach enhances motivation and engagement by allowing students to make choices about their goals, methods, and assessments. Research from the OECD highlights that student agency correlates with improved academic performance and higher levels of lifelong learning skills. Integrating student agency within curricula supports personalized learning and cultivates essential 21st-century competencies.

Critical Thinking

Critical thinking in education fosters analytical skills by encouraging students to evaluate information, identify biases, and develop reasoned arguments. It enhances problem-solving abilities through the application of logic and evidence-based reasoning across diverse subjects. Educators integrate critical thinking into curricula using debates, case studies, and inquiry-based learning to promote deeper understanding. Research from the National Education Association highlights that critical thinking skills significantly improve academic performance and lifelong learning capabilities.

Source and External Links

Education Methods: Banking vs. Problem Posing - This webpage discusses Paulo Freire's concepts of banking and problem-posing education, highlighting their differences and implications for student learning and participation.

"Banking" vs. Problem-Posing Education - This article contrasts the banking model, which treats students as passive recipients of knowledge, with the problem-posing model, which encourages active dialogue and critical thinking.

Key Pedagogic Thinkers: Paulo Friere - This resource examines Paulo Freire's educational theories, focusing on the banking and problem-posing models and how they influence students' roles as active participants in knowledge creation.

FAQs

What is the banking model of education?

The banking model of education is a teaching approach where students are viewed as passive recipients of knowledge deposited by teachers, emphasizing memorization and rote learning over critical thinking and creativity.

What is the problem-posing model of education?

The problem-posing model of education, developed by Paulo Freire, emphasizes dialogue and critical thinking, transforming students from passive recipients into active participants who question and analyze knowledge to develop deeper understanding and social awareness.

How do the two models differ in teaching approach?

Model A emphasizes experiential learning through hands-on activities, while Model B focuses on theoretical instruction and lecture-based teaching.

What are the main criticisms of the banking model?

The main criticisms of the banking model include its promotion of passive learning, suppression of creativity and critical thinking, reinforcement of power hierarchies between teachers and students, and treatment of students as empty containers to be filled with information.

How does the problem-posing model encourage critical thinking?

The problem-posing model encourages critical thinking by engaging learners in active dialogue that challenges existing knowledge, promotes questioning, reflection, and the exploration of multiple perspectives to construct deeper understanding.

What roles do teachers and students have in each model?

In the traditional model, teachers primarily deliver content as instructors while students passively receive information; in the flipped model, teachers act as facilitators guiding active learning, and students engage with instructional materials independently before class to participate interactively during sessions.

Why is the problem-posing model considered more empowering for learners?

The problem-posing model is considered more empowering for learners because it encourages active participation, critical thinking, and dialogue, enabling learners to co-create knowledge rather than passively receive information.



About the author.

Disclaimer.
The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and is not guaranteed to be complete. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of the content, we cannot guarantee that the details mentioned are up-to-date or applicable to all scenarios. Topics about Banking Model vs Problem-Posing Model are subject to change from time to time.

Comments

No comment yet