calledges.com 
Executive aggrandizement refers to the gradual accumulation of power by a country's executive branch through legal or quasi-legal means, often weakening checks and balances. Self-coup, or autocoup, occurs when a sitting leader unlawfully seizes additional power, typically dissolving other branches of government or suspending constitutional norms. Explore the distinctions between these political maneuvers and their implications for democratic governance.
Main Difference
Executive aggrandizement involves a sitting leader expanding their power incrementally through legal or extra-legal means within constitutional bounds, often by altering laws or institutions to weaken checks and balances. Self-coup, or autogolpe, occurs when a leader who initially gained power constitutionally dissolves or disregards other branches of government, suspends the constitution, or annuls elections to concentrate authority abruptly. Executive aggrandizement is a gradual erosion of democratic norms, while self-coup is a sudden seizure of complete control. Examples include Hungary under Viktor Orban for executive aggrandizement and Alberto Fujimori's 1992 autogolpe in Peru for a self-coup.
Connection
Executive aggrandizement often manifests through incremental power consolidation by a leader, weakening institutional checks and balances. This process can escalate into a self-coup, where the executive unlawfully dissolves or neutralizes other branches of government to cement absolute authority. Both phenomena reflect strategies aiming at undermining democratic frameworks to establish autocratic rule.
Comparison Table
| Aspect | Executive Aggrandizement | Self-coup (Autogolpe) |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Gradual increase of executive power beyond constitutional limits, often through legal or political manipulation. | Sudden illegal seizure of additional power by an existing leader, often by dissolving or overriding other branches of government. |
| Nature of Action | Incremental and often subtle, involving legislative reforms, weakening of checks and balances. | Rapid and overt, involving coups d'etat, suspension of constitution, or closing of legislatures. |
| Legal Status | May appear legally justified or constitutional on the surface due to manipulation of laws. | Typically illegal and unconstitutional act that violates existing laws and democratic norms. |
| Goal | Consolidate power within the office of the executive, reducing influence of opposition or judiciary over time. | Instant consolidation of all governing power by the executive, nullifying opposition and institutional constraints. |
| Examples | Expansion of presidential terms through legal amendments, appointment of loyalists to key positions. | Fujimori's 1992 self-coup in Peru, where the president dissolved Congress and suspended the constitution. |
| Impact on Democracy | Erodes democratic norms gradually, weakening institutional checks and balance. | Immediate breakdown of democratic order and suspension of democratic institutions. |
| Related Concepts | Authoritarian drift, executive overreach, democratic backsliding. | Coups d'etat, dictatorship establishment, constitutional crises. |
Executive Aggrandizement
Executive aggrandizement refers to the process by which a political executive, such as a president or prime minister, expands their powers beyond constitutional or legal limits. This phenomenon often involves the centralization of authority, weakening of checks and balances, and undermining of democratic institutions. Studies indicate that countries experiencing executive aggrandizement typically show declines in governmental transparency, accountability, and civil liberties. Examples include the progressive accumulation of presidential powers observed in nations like Turkey since 2014 and Hungary under Viktor Orban since 2010.
Self-coup (Autogolpe)
A self-coup, or autogolpe, occurs when a sitting government, typically the executive branch, unlawfully assumes extraordinary powers by dissolving or bypassing other branches of government such as the legislature or judiciary. This illegal seizure often involves suspending constitutional norms and civil liberties to consolidate control, effectively undermining democratic institutions and the rule of law. Notable examples include Alberto Fujimori's 1992 autogolpe in Peru, where he dissolved Congress and restructured the judiciary to maintain power. Self-coups pose significant risks to political stability and democratic governance worldwide.
Democratic Backsliding
Democratic backsliding refers to the gradual decline in the quality of democracy, often marked by erosion in civil liberties, weakening of political institutions, and reduced accountability of elected officials. Key indicators include restrictions on press freedom, undermining judicial independence, and manipulation of electoral processes. Countries experiencing democratic backsliding often see increased polarization, decline in political pluralism, and concentration of power in the executive branch. Data from the V-Dem Institute and Freedom House highlight significant backsliding trends in nations such as Hungary, Turkey, and Venezuela over the past decade.
Constitutional Manipulation
Constitutional manipulation refers to the strategic alteration or reinterpretation of a nation's constitution to serve specific political agendas and consolidate power. This practice often involves exploiting legal loopholes, amending fundamental rights, or undermining checks and balances to weaken democratic institutions. Countries experiencing constitutional manipulation typically face increased authoritarianism, reduced judicial independence, and diminished public trust in governance. Examples include Poland's 2015 judiciary reforms and Turkey's 2017 constitutional referendum expanding presidential powers.
Power Consolidation
Power consolidation in politics involves the strategic acquisition and centralization of authority by individuals or groups to strengthen control over governmental functions. This process often includes the reduction of checks and balances, reorganization of institutions, and suppression of opposition to maintain dominance. Key historical examples include Julius Caesar's rise in ancient Rome, Adolf Hitler's regime in Germany, and recent consolidations in geopolitical hotspots like Venezuela. Effective power consolidation reshapes political landscapes, frequently impacting democratic norms and governance structures.
Source and External Links
The Trump Self-Coup Attempt - This article discusses the concept of a self-coup, where a leader seizes power illegitimately, contrasting with executive aggrandizement, which involves gradual power consolidation.
Executive Aggrandizement and its Outcomes - This document explains executive aggrandizement as a process of incrementally increasing power through legal means, differing from self-coups, which involve sudden and illegal seizures of power.
Self-coup - A self-coup involves a leader illegally seizing power through sudden actions, unlike executive aggrandizement, which typically occurs through gradual erosion of checks on power.
FAQs
What is executive aggrandizement?
Executive aggrandizement is the process by which a president or chief executive expands their power beyond constitutional limits, often undermining checks and balances.
What is a self-coup?
A self-coup occurs when a nation's leader illegally assumes extraordinary powers, often dissolving or bypassing other government branches to maintain control.
How does executive aggrandizement differ from a self-coup?
Executive aggrandizement involves a leader gradually increasing presidential powers through legal or institutional means without overturning democratic structures. A self-coup occurs when a leader illegally seizes additional powers by dissolving or bypassing other branches of government, effectively dismantling constitutional order.
What strategies are used in executive aggrandizement?
Executive aggrandizement strategies include consolidating power by undermining checks and balances, manipulating legal frameworks to extend terms, controlling the media to shape public opinion, repressing opposition through intimidation or legal action, and co-opting key institutions like the judiciary, military, and electoral bodies.
What are examples of self-coup actions?
Examples of self-coup actions include President Alberto Fujimori dissolving Peru's Congress in 1992, President Hugo Chavez closing Venezuela's National Assembly sessions in 2002, and President Erdogan undermining Turkey's judiciary and parliament after the 2016 coup attempt.
What are the dangers of executive aggrandizement?
Executive aggrandizement risks undermining democratic checks and balances, concentrating power in one individual, enabling authoritarianism, eroding civil liberties, and fostering corruption.
How do societies respond to self-coup attempts?
Societies respond to self-coup attempts through widespread protests, civil unrest, political mobilization, international condemnation, and sometimes military or judicial intervention to restore democratic order.